Mark Jacobs is Peeved with Society, so Watch It
Cruelty to animals
A brief introduction to the covert practices of "civilised" societies (MP3 - 19.9MB)
by William Cooper in 1989.
"Some lie dying" WMV 4.86 MB 12m 58s
showing animals going to slaughter.
"Meet Your Meat" WMV 28.6 MB 12m 49s
Elmkirk Ltd (Cheale Meats) slaughterhouse MP4 21.1MB 4m 9s
Hopi Prophecy : "Near the Day of Purification, there will be cobwebs spun back and forth in
the sky." Now look at the chemtrails in the normally clear blue skies. These seem to consist
of aluminium and barium salts, plus man-made fibrils that can cause skin and lung irritation.
I live in Harrow, Middlesex, UK. I was astonished to see these b***ards (I said buzzards for
those of you complaining) in the sky over my house as I came out to get the kids to school
and then go to work. It was January 24th 2003 at 9:00 am GMT when I took these :-
That's the moon and the first jet - it was a beauty of a morning. Then another joined in :-
More criss-cross patterns and jets started to form :-
The "Mark of Zorro" with the moon :-
About 6 to 7 jets were in the sky at once. Here one of the Zorro jets in action :-
Then, having dropped the kids off at school, off I set to the office in Carpenders Park. Now, my
office is about 7 miles away from my home, so I was surprised to see the same thing happening.
I got out of the car and took these at 9:30 am the same day :-
Wow, they have been busy :-
There are bungalows here, so it's easier to see them :-
Another jet flies over, but it's not leaving a trail :-
On arrival at the office at 9:35 am, the infamous "Mark of Zorro" again :-
Later, at 4 pm that day, you can still see these "trails". Over my house :-
And over the office :-
In both cases, you can see the dark gloomy natural clouds that have formed nearby. Are they
related? I don't know. I have e-mailed Harrow council in very early January about these
trails and I have had no reply as of yet.
More recently, the trails are much more obvious. There have been many times that I have seen
both a commercial airliner and one of these mysterious chemjets flying in the sky at the same time.
The commercial airliner leaves either nothing at all, or a trail that disappears after 10 to 30 seconds.
The chemjets leave these mushy-sky-making trails that do not disappear, but disperse into wispy, long "clouds".
These were taken in November of 2005 :-
10 minutes later these had started to disperse :-
Example of trail plumage into wispy, long clouds :-
The ensuing mush :-
Some miscellaneous shots :-
My own speculations and research as to what purpose
these trails are for, has come up with the following possibilities :-
Here's some more speculation.
More recently, I have concluded that they are packed with aluminium and barium, so as to increase
human susceptibility to microwave mind control emanating from the street furniture in following section.
- Due to their toxic nature, an attempt to scare humanity back into the artificial
environments of their own homes. Sounds Orwellian.
- Due to the highly reflective nature of the plumes, they could be used to assuage the effects
of global warming, to try and keep the population from panicking that we really are heating up.
- Due to the chemical analysis of the trails' fallout, both in water and on the ground, and the
discovery of Trimethyl Aluminum (TMA), barium, various viruses and red blood cells in said fallout, the
governments of the NATO countries (which seem to be the only ones spraying chemtrails at the electorates)
are trying to kill off the populations with slow, lingering ailments that nobody could pin on any
particular cause, or experiment on them with different DNA-altered flu-like viruses (incidence of this
seems to have hit everyone round where I live).
- A way of "zipping the skies shut", to hide something, and obscure it with dense cloud cover.
- An absurd attempt at "weather control". Mother Nature controls us, not vice versa.
- And finally, an even more absurd, but plausible reason for them. There may be a benign
reason for the secrecy and content of chemtrails. There may have been discoveries in disease
research which found viruses so dangerous and infectious to mankind that a covert mass
inoculation plan had to be undertaken, which involved dosing people with small amounts of the
viruses so as to build an immune resistance to the real threats. Some people may get ill for a
short time, but it is a small price to pay, to save mankind from a looming disaster, too scary
to disclose in the mass media. This would allay those arguments based on the premise "Why
would the powers that be poison themselves too?" because it would have to be global, if
secretive good intent were meant. Chemtrails are becoming global, but the media are keeping
their true intents a secret. Some parts of the world are still largely inaccessible, but can be
reached by tanker plane. The immunisation will affect everybody, even cave dwellers, and
nobody can stop it to argue that they'd rather take their chances and see what happens, because
the viruses are so infectious and imminent. In this case, I'd be honest with the public and
tell them the bad news in a calm and constructive manner. Offer a voluntary treatment instead
of the expense and pollution caused by tanker plane usage. Ask scientists everywhere to work on
a cure, and supply all the funding from what they are currently using to wage pointless wars.
"God knows what" Masts
If you haven't already, please read how harmful these things really are at the
World Health website
or my mirror of the article, The Radiation Poisoning Of America.
These new "phone" masts that have sprouted up suddenly and ubiquitously all over the UK have
no indication of what company they are for, no adverstising banners or suchlike, and yet,
they are appearing in such profusion, it begs the question, "Where's the money coming from?".
It will have cost either the tax-payer or the mobile phone companies a lot of money to
research, manufacture, and erect these things all over the country. If the mobile phone
companies footed the bill, why have they not brandished their brand names all over them? They
are already unsightly enough, so it could only enhance the appearance of this new form of
street furniture. Perhaps the government has an alternative agenda for their use, that these
companies do not condone, and therefore, do not want to be an obvious party to. Who knows?
I never get any answers from MPs or councils.
Here are some masts round about where I live. This is a new breed of masts which I call
"thumpers" because I suspect they have something to do with the
Taos Hum (excellent
article by Gerry Vassilatos
gives more details) experienced round here since its recent installation on Harrow Weald
High Road :-
Keep your eyes peeled for these. I'm sure many more will sprouting up soon (though who is
paying for them is anyone's guess!). They do not seem to have any directional array, so
what they are used for is a bit of a mystery. Here is the same one with a chem-trail
(common as muck in Harrow nowadays) behind it :-
Here is the control box for it. As you can see, fly-posting is allowed, but no sign of any
mobile phone company logos, despite it being a radio transmitter of some kind :-
Here is another of the same type in Eastcote Road Pinner :-
This is a mast in Tudor Road. What is unusual is that there is a control room directly
attached to it. It is also easily accessible and bang in the middle of a residential area :-
Here is the Portakabin control room which the cables run into (looks quite cosy in there!?!),
though why would you need a control room that seats 3 comfortably, for a mobile phone mast?
This next array is bang next to a care home on Harrow Weald High Road :-
Next to the railway bridge on Harrow View, overlooking a huge residential area :-
In a field between Harrow Weald and Carpenders Park, again overlooking a residential area:-
This one is situated in a field of the Braziers Dairy farm near Watford. It's huge :-
I went out to (what I consider to be) the most inappropriately placed "mobile
phone" mast in all of the UK. Now, this thing is immense, and you feel really dwarfed when
standing under it. Here is the identifying name-plate for it :-
This is as much of it I could get in the camera-frame at one time. It shows the thickness of
the multitude of electricity supply cables inside its metal tower :-
Standing bang next to the 8 foot high iron gate (one of its many defenses) :-
It's a whopper. Another angle :-
This was taken standing just in front of the sign in the picture after this one :-
Turn around and here is the sign, showing where this mast is situated. Utter madness :-
Don't they know about the health risks these large high-powered masts can cause?!?
Plus, they seem to have sprouted up everywhere recently. All of these masts are within 5
miles of each other. Why do they need so many densely-packed high-powered masts? In the
Philippines, you hardly ever see masts, but they have phenomenally good mobile coverage
over the entire country. Does "white man" government like to experiment on its electorate?
Is the government that evil?
Cruelty to Animals
When you see things my way, the behaviour of the average consumer is inexcusable. If I want to
wash my daughter's hair with a new shampoo, under no circumstances would I condone a rabbit
having its eyes purulent and weepy. I would rather wash her hair in water or get her to use
swimming goggles! From a naturalist's point of view, most of the animal-tested products in
society are unnecessary, unnatural, and probably good for no-one. Why then do we still think we
have to buy them (deodorants, soaps, pharmaceuticals, dyes, cosmetics ...) when they cause so
much unnecessary suffering? Because we're socially conditioned to be consumers. From the
nurseries, through the schools, and into our homes, we are bombarded with messages that tell us
to behave in a certain way, and consume stuff the average caveman would chortle at. Naturally
gregarious human beings are suggestible when unconsciously given the threat of ostracism, so
we go and do it. It is now time to wake up. Experimentation on mammals like rats and mice is
commonplace in so-called "civilised societies". Such animals are highly intelligent and
sensitive creatures and we owe our own evolution to them. We should be treating them with love
and kindness. Instead, we butcher them and inflict permanent misery on them. This is wrong,
no matter what ideologies we use to vindicate our actions. Animal experimentation has to stop
NOW! I hope these pictures of sinister human behaviour shock you, because there can be no
ethical justification for the following scenes :-
"Some lie dying" Windows media file 4.86 MB 12m 58s
showing animals going to slaughter, amongst many other disturbing things. I honestly cannot
watch this film all the way through without crying. Call me soft, but this is tragic. Another
portrayal of common animal husbandry which I find upsetting to watch is
"Meet Your Meat" Windows media file 28.6 MB 12m 49s. If human
beings continue to treat other species with such gay abandon, they will surely suffer tragedy
in the universal "justice zone". Eating this meat is the same as condoning the practices used
to rear and slaughter it. You have been warned!
Also, have a look at Animal
Freedom's video selection and Latest Accounts of
Animal Experimentation. You may want to act after seeing these.
"Thou shalt not kill". And slaughtering your own flesh and blood is inexcusable in any way,
shape or form. Where do humans get off in this day and age saying things like, "We have a
right to control our own lives", when they quite obviously don't, and even if they did,
they'd rather a government do it for them. I have yet to hear of one argument for the killing
of an unborn child. As far as I am concerned, the magic of life has started the instant the
sperm fuses with the egg. There is no going back from there. Even if it means inevitable
death for the mother. Even if it means a bad life for both the mother and child (bad can only
be comparative - look at the Philippines and compare it to life in the UK). It is
irreversible fate, and if you start murdering to avert it, nature will come along and punish
you for it. Even if it means having a nagging conscience for the rest of your life, murder
always haunts the murderer. Even if a woman is raped, she should still have the child - the
DNA of the baby may one day help pinpoint the father, so he can help with the child's
upkeep. Look at these pictures of how human beings' distorted mental framework allows this to
happen to members of its own species :-
In summary then, human beings are plain shits. Unless they change their sheepish
"follow the pack" ways, they will get their come-uppance :-
Back to Main Page