EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTIONS REGARDING FREQUENCY WEAPONS
Watered down, but still significant for the 21st century, resolutions
passed at least MENTION neuro-influence technology indirectly.
This, together with Amnesty International and World Organization Against Torture (OMCT) begin to show a limited interest in neuro-influence technology, providing hope for those of us who have been used as involuntary test subjects.
RESOLUTIONS PASSED JANUARY 28, 1999:
Below are the resolutions passed by the European Parliament. In my personal opinion, these are VERY watered down with respect to the current state of neuro-influence devices, however, they give a slim hope that someday, esteemed politicians and media may give lip service to this highly invasive technology. Eleanor White
Resolution adopted by the European Parliament, 28.1.99 Environment, security and foreign affairs A4-0005/99
23. Calls on the European Union to seek to have the new 'non-lethal' weapons technology and the development of new arms strategies also covered and regulated by international conventions;
24. Considers HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Project) by virtue of its far-reaching impact on the environment to be a global concern and calls for its legal, ecological and ethical implications to be examined by an international independent body before any further research and testing; regrets the repeated refusal of the United States Administration to send anyone in person to give evidence to the public hearing or any subsequent meeting held by its competent committee into the environmental and public risks connected with the HAARP programme currently being funded in Alaska;
25. Requests the Scientific and Technological Options Assessment (STOA) Panel to agree to examine the scientific and technical evidence provided in all existing research findings on HAARP to assess the exact nature and degree of risk that HAARP poses both to the local and global environment and to public health generally;
26. Calls on the Commission to examine if there are environmental and PUBLIC HEALTH implications of the HAARP programme for Arctic Europe and to report back to Parliament with its findings;
27. CALLS FOR AN INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION INTRODUCING A GLOBAL BAN ON ALL DEVELOPMENTS AND DEPLOYMENTS OF WEAPONS WHICH MIGHT ENABLE ANY FORM OF MANIPULATION OF HUMAN BEINGS;