Affidavit
of Richard Tomlinson
|
I, Richard John Charles Tomlinson, former MI6 officer, of Geneva, Switzerland hereby declare: 1.. I firmly believe that
there exist documents held by the British Secret Intelligence Service
(MI6) that would yield important new evidence into the cause and circumstances
leading to the deaths of the Princess of Wales, Mr Dodi Al Fayed, and
M. Henri Paul in Paris in August 1997. 2.. I was employed by MI6
between September 1991 and April 1995. During that time, I saw various
documents that I believe would provide new evidence and new leads into
the investigation into these deaths. I also heard various rumours which
though I was not able to see supporting documents I am confident were
based on solid fact. 3.. In 1992, I was working
in the Eastern European Controllerate of MI6 and I was peripherally
involved in a large and complicated operation to smuggle advanced Soviet
weaponry out of the then disintegrating and disorganised remnants of
the Soviet Union. During 1992, I spent several days reading the substantial
files on this operation. These files contain a wide miscellany of contact
notes, telegrams, intelligence reports, photographs etc, from which
it was possible to build up a detailed understanding of the operation.
The operation involved a large cast of officers and agents of MI6. On
more than one occasion, meetings between various figures in the operation
took place at the Ritz Hotel, Place de Vendome, Paris. There were in
the file several intelligence reports on these meetings, which had been
written by one of the MI6 officers based in Paris at the time (identified
in the file only by a coded designation). The source of the information
was an informant in the Ritz Hotel, who again was identified
in the files only by a code number. The MI6 officer paid the informant
in cash for his information. I became curious to learn more about the
identity of this particular informant, because his number cropped up
several times and he seemed to have extremely good access to the goings
on in the Ritz Hotel. I therefore ordered this informants personal file
from MI6's central file registry. When I read this new file, I was not
at all surprised to learn that the informant was a security officer
of the Ritz Hotel. Intelligence
services always target the security officers of important hotels because
they have such good access to intelligence. I remember, however, being
mildly surprised that the nationality of this informant was French,
and this stuck in my memory, because it is rare that MI6 succeeds in
recruiting a French informer. I cannot claim that I remember from this
reading of the file that the name of this person was Henri Paul, but
I have no doubt with the benefit of
hindsight that this was he. Although I did not subsequently come
across Henri Paul again during my time in MI6, I am confident that the
relationship between he and MI6 would have continued until his death,
because MI6 would never willingly relinquish control over such a well
placed informant. I am sure that the personal file of Henri Paul will
therefore contain notes of meetings between him and his MI6 controlling
officer right up until the point of his death. I firmly believe that these
files will contain evidence of crucial importance to the circumstances
and causes of the incident that killed M. Paul, together with the Princess
of Wales and Dodi Al Fayed. 4.. The most senior undeclared
officer in the local MI6 station would normally control an informant
of M. Paul's usefulness and seniority. Officers declared to the local
counter-intelligence service (in this case the Directorate de Surveillance
Territoire, or DST) would not be used to control such an informant,
because it might lead to the identity of the informant becoming known
to the local intelligence services. In Paris at the time of M. Paul's death, there were two relatively
experienced but undeclared MI6 officers. The first was Mr Nicholas John
Andrew LANGMAN, born 1960. The second was Mr Richard David SPEARMAN,
again born in 1960. I firmly believe that either one or both of these
officers will be well acquainted with M Paul, and most probably also
met M. Paul shortly before his death. I believe that either or both
of these officers will have knowledge that will be of crucial importance in establishing
the sequence of events leading up to the deaths of M.Paul, Dodi Al Fayed
and the Princess of Wales. Mr Spearman in particular was an extremely
well connected and influential officer, because he had been, prior to
his appointment in Paris, the personal secretary to the Chief of MI6
Mr David SPEDDING. As such, he would have been privy to even the most
confidential of MI6 operations. I believe that there may well be significance
in the fact that Mr Spearman was posted to Paris in the month immediately
before the deaths. 5.. Later in 1992, as the
civil war in the former Yugoslavia became increasingly topical, I started
to work primarily on operations in Serbia. During this time, I became
acquainted with Dr Nicholas Bernard Frank FISHWICK, born 1958, the MI6
officer who at the time was in charge of planning Balkan operations.
During one meeting with Dr Fishwick, he casually showed to
me a three-page document that on closer inspection turned out to be
an outline plan to assassinate the Serbian leader President Slobodan
Milosevic. The plan was fully typed, and attached to a yellow "minute
board", signifying that this was a formal and accountable document.
It will therefore still be in existence. Fishwick had annotated that
the document be circulated to the following senior MI6 officers: Maurice
KENDWRICK-PIERCEY, then head of
Balkan operations, John RIDDE, then the security officer for Balkan
operations, the SAS liaison officer to MI6 (designation MODA/SO, but
I have forgotten his name), the head of the Eastern European Controllerate
(then Richard FLETCHER) and finally Alan PETTY, the personal secretary
to the then Chief of MI6, Colin McCOLL. This plan contained a political
justification for the assassination of Milosevic, followed by three outline proposals
on how to achieve this objective. I firmly believe that the third of
these scenarios contained information that could be useful in establishing
the causes of death of Henri Paul, the
Princess of Wales, and Dodi Al Fayed. This third scenario suggested
that Milosevic could be assassinated by causing his personal limousine
to crash. Dr Fishwick proposed to arrange the crash in a tunnel, because
the proximity of concrete close to the road would ensure that the crash
would be sufficiently violent to cause death or serious injury, and
would also reduce the possibility that there might be independent, casual
witnesses. Dr Fishwick suggested that one way to cause the crash might
be to disorientate the chauffeur using a strobe flash
gun, a device which is occasionally deployed by special forces to, for
example, disorientate helicopter pilots or terrorists, and about which
MI6 officers are briefed about during their training. In short, this
scenario bore remarkable similarities to the circumstances and witness
accounts of the crash that killed the Princess of Wales, Dodi Al Fayed,
and Henri Paul. I firmly believe that this document should be yielded
by MI6 to the Judge investigating
these deaths, and would provide further leads that he could follow.
6.. During my service in
MI6, I also learnt unofficially and second-hand something of the links
between MI6 and the Royal Household. MI6 are frequently and routinely
asked by the Royal Household (usually via the Foreign Office) to provide
intelligence on potential threats to members of the Royal Family whilst
on overseas trips. This service would frequently extend to asking friendly
intelligence services (such as the CIA) to place members of the Royal
Family under discrete surveillance, ostensibly for their own protection.
This was particularly the case for the Princess of Wales, who often
insisted on doing without overt personal protection, even on overseas
trips. Although contact between MI6 and the Royal Household was officially
only via the Foreign Office, I learnt while in MI6 that there was unofficial
direct contact between certain senior and influential MI6 officers and
senior members of the Royal Household. I did not see any official papers
on this subject, but I am confident that the information is correct.
I firmly believe that MI6 documents would yield substantial leads on
the nature of their links with the Royal Household, and would yield
vital information about MI6 surveillance on the Princess of Wales in
the days leading to her death. 7.. I also learnt while in
MI6 that one of the "paparazzi" photographers who routinely
followed the Princess of Wales was a member of "UKN", a small
corps of part-time MI6 agents who provide miscellaneous services to
MI6 such as surveillance and photography expertise. I do not know the
identity of this photographer, or whether he was one of the photographers
present at the time of the fatal incident. However, I am confident that
examination of UKN records would yield the identity of this photographer,
and would enable the inquest to eliminate or further investigate that
potential line of enquiry. 8.. On Friday August 28 1998,
I gave much of this information to Judge Herve Stephan, the French investigative
Judge in charge of the inquest into the accident. The lengths which
MI6, the CIA and the DST have taken to deter me giving this evidence
and subsequently to stop me talking about it, suggests that they have
something to hide. 9.. On Friday 31 July 1998,
shortly before my appointment with Judge Herve Stephan, the DST arrested
me in my Paris hotel room. Although I have no record of violent conduct
I was arrested with such ferocity and at gunpoint that I received a
broken rib. I was taken to the headquarters of the DST, and interrogated
for 38 hours. Despite my repeated requests, I was never given any justification
for the arrest and was not shown the arrest warrant. Even though I was
released without charge, the DST confiscated from me my laptop computer
and Psion organiser. They illegally gave these to MI6 who took them
back to the UK. They were not returned for six months, which is illegal
and caused me great inconvenience and financial cost. 10.. On Friday 7th August
1998 I boarded a Qantas flight at Auckland International airport, New
Zealand, for a flight to Sydney, Australia where I was due to give a
television interview to the Australian Channel Nine television company.
I was in my seat, awaiting take off, when an official boarded the plane
and told me to get off. At the airbridge, he told me that the airline
had received a fax "from Canberra" saying that there was a
problem with my travel papers. I immediately asked to see the fax, but
I was told that "it was not possible". I believe that this
is because it didn't exist. This action was a ploy to keep me in New
Zealand so that the New Zealand police could take further action against
me. I had been back in my Auckland hotel room for about half an hour
when the New Zealand police and NZSIS, the New Zealand Secret
Intelligence Service, raided me. After being detained and searched for
about three hours, they eventually confiscated from me all my remaining
computer equipment that the French DST had not succeeded in taking from
me. Again, I didn't get some of these items back until six months later. 11.. Moreover, shortly after
I had given this evidence to Judge Stephan, I was invited to talk about
this evidence in a live television interview on America's NBC television
channel. I flew from Geneva to JFK airport on Sunday 30 August to give
the interview in New York on the following Monday morning. Shortly after
arrival at John F Kennedy airport, the captain of the Swiss Air flight
told all passengers to return to their seats. Four US Immigration authority officers entered
the plane, came straight to my seat, asked for my passport and identity,
and then frogmarched me off the plane. I was taken to the immigration
detention centre, photographed, fingerprinted, manacled by my ankle
to a chair for seven hours, served with deportation papers (exhibit
1) and then returned on the next available plane to Geneva. I was not
allowed to make any telephone calls to the representatives of NBC awaiting
me in the airport. The US Immigration Officers - who were all openly
sympathetic to my situation and apologised for treating me so badly
- openly admitted that they were acting under instructions from the
CIA. 12.. In January of this year,
I booked a chalet in the village of Samoens in the French Alps for a
ten day snowboarding holiday with my parents. I picked up my parents
from Geneva airport in a hire car on the evening of January 8, and set
off for the French border. At the French customs post, our car was stopped
and I was detained. Four officers from the DST held me for four hours.
At the end of this interview, I was served with the deportation papers below (exhibit
2), and ordered to return to Switzerland. Note that in the papers, my
supposed destination has been changed from "Chamonix" to "Samoens".
This is because when first questioned by a junior DST officer, I told
him that my destination was "Chamonix". When a senior officer
arrived an hour or so later, he crossed out the word and changed it
to "Samoens", without ever even asking or confirming this
with me. I believe this is because MI6 had told them
of my true destination, having learnt the information through surveillance
on my parent's telephone in the UK. My banning from France is entirely
illegal under European law. I have a British passport and am entitled
to travel freely within the European Union. MI6 have "done a deal"
with the DST to have me banned, and have not used any recognised legal
mechanism to deny my rights to freedom of travel. I believe that the DST and MI6 have banned
me from France because they wanted to prevent me from giving further
evidence to Judge Stephan's inquest, which at the time, I was planning
to do. 13.. Whatever MI6s role in
the events leading to the death of the Princess of Wales, Dodi Al Fayed
and Henri Paul, I am absolutely certain that there is substantial evidence
in their files that would provide crucial evidence in establishing the
exact causes of this tragedy. I believe that they have gone to considerable
lengths to obstruct the course of justice by interfering with my freedom
of speech and travel, and this in my view confirms my belief that they
have something to hide. I believe that the protection given to MI6 files
under the Official Secrets Act should be set aside in the public interest
in uncovering once and for all the truth behind these dramatic and historically
momentous events.
|
|
|