Ordinary Language, Visible Language and Virtual Reality
by Terence McKenna
Shall we talk about language? (yeah) First of all lets talk about
ordinary language which is probably the closest thing to a miracle in the
natural world. Its the major neurological manifestation of difference between
ourselves and other animals and primates and its not a physiological
difference its a difference in behavior. Language represents the most complex
behavior ever observed in any animal and certainly its the most complex thing
any of us ever learns to do. We're born into what William James calls a
blooming buzzing confusion, but by the aquisition of words we mosaic over
various sectors of this blooming buzzing confusion with words. We replace the
unknown with the known through the substitution of words and by the time a
child is two or three they have completely created a cultural mosaic of words
that is interposed between them and reality. Reality from that point on is
only an unconfirmed rumor brought through the medium of language and every
culture accentuates different parts of reality so that in a sense every
culture is a different reality. Language is the stuff of the world, not
quarks or wave-packets or neutrinos, but language. Everything is made of
language. All the constructs of science are actually interlocking constructs
of syntax. So that's ordinary language which seems to define reality through
a kind of process of lying about it. For instance by creating subject-object
distinctions which are, in fact, not true to the matter, but somehow
operationally necessary for us to navigate in the kind of lower dimensional
space that we inhabit.
Then there is the phenomenon of non-ordinary, or what I call
visible language and this is very interesting to me. This is where technology, virtual-reality, cybernetics, human-machine interfacing can actually make an
impact and explore a frontier. Visual language is a transormation of the
physiological impulse towards syntax into a final product, speech, which is
not heard with the ears, but beheld with the eyes. It's very interesting that
all our metaphors of clarity of speech are visual metaphors. We say, 'I see
what you mean, he spoke clearly.' This means that at the organismic level
we associate a higher signal clarity with visual input, and on DMT and other
tryptamine psychedelics you actually experience the field of language both
heard and self generated as something that is visibly beheld. Its almost as
though the project of communication becomes high-speed sculpture in a
conceptual dimension made of light and intentionality. This would remain a
kind of esoteric performance on the part of shamans at the height of
intoxication if it were not for the fact that electronics and electronic
cultural media, computers, make it possible for us to actually create records
of these higher linguistic modalities. In other words its possible to imagine
a virtual reality that was driven by a speech operated synthesizer where the
various parts of ordinary speech adjectives, modifiers, subjects and objects
were interpreted by the cybernetic environment as topological manifolds of
various shapes so that speech would then generate a visibly beheld topology
and its possible to imagine a future world where in setting up marriage
contracts or in negotiating corporate takeovers, in areas where clear
communication, clear expression of intentionality was very important, that
people would actually go into the virtual reality to use the visible language
because its capacity for conveying intent would be much greater than ordinary
spoken language. It's not for nothing that Plato connected up the notion of
the Good, the True, and ultimately, the Beautiful. The beautiful of those
three concepts is the primary concept because it is visibly beheld, because
it is seen. This is the great convincing power of the psychedelic experience.
That it ultimately appeals to us through the sense that we value most. That
we existentially relate to as the most authentic and that is the visual.
Visible language is a kind of telepathy because if i make a statement in
visual language and then you and I regard my statement, we are somehow, in
the act of regarding, made one. Because meaning is not being created out of
interiorized dictionaries which we each consult in the privacy of our own
mind but rather meaning is a visible manifold in the public domain. Meaning
goes public and the differences between people then decline toward being
insignificant. Its a kind of final confirmation of the McLuhan apotheosis
and i think visible language is coming. Life in the imagination is to be the
life of creativity carried on through these virtual environments driven by
linguistic engines.
The starships of the future, in other words the vehicles of the future, which will explore the high frontier of the unknown will be syntactical. The engineers of the future will be poets. This is what virtual reality holds out to us - the possibility of walking in to the constructs of the imagination. In a way culture is that. I mean our cities, bridges, highways, airliners and art galleries are condensations out of the imagination, but at tremendous cost because we must make them out of matter. Once we can make them out of light, out of electrons, then we won't build skyscrapers a hundred and twenty stories high, we'll build them as high as we want. Roof height will no longer be a factor ruled by cost effectiveness and gravity, it will be a parameter ruled by the imagination as will all other parameters and then we will discover what man truly is - when we are able to erect, stabilize. share and explore our dreams in a kind of virtual hyperspace that, carefully analyzed, is seen to be linguistic. That's what its connectors are made out of, that's what its ferro-concrete and steel is, is the edifice of language. This is what the stuff of the imagination is made of and I think this is what we're moving toward. The psychedelic shamans have always known this. Now the psychedelic underground art community points toward this goal and leads the way.
This is a segue from yesterday's discussion about visible language. The notion being that, well let me review what yesterday was about. It was about the idea that if we could see language, if language were a project of understanding that used the eyes for the extraction of meaning rather than the ears, that it would be a kind of telepathy. There would be both a fusion of the observer with the object observed, and with the person communicated with. The place in nature where something like this has actually evolved and occurred is in the cephalopods; the squid and the circoliveral (sp) octopii. These are animals that divided from the line of development that leads to human beings over six hundred million years ago. They're mollusks, they're related to escargo, it's an organism very different from ourselves. Nevertheless, one of the things that evolutionary biologists always talk about is the convergent evolution between the eyes of cephalopods and the eyes of higher mammals. This is because the cephalopods live in an extremely complex visual environment and in fact, they have evolved a form of communication that approximates this visible language that i'm talking about because these octopii have chromataphores all over the exterior of their bodies. Chromataphores are cells that can change color. Now many people know that octopii can change color but they think its for camoflage, for blending in with the environment, this is not at all the case. The reason octopii change colors in a very large repatoire of stripes, dots, blushes, travelling shades and tonal shifts is because this is for them a channel of linguistic communication. In other words they don't transduce their linguistic intentionality into small mouth noises like we do. Small mouth noises which then move as sound across space in the form of vibrations of the air. Rather, they actually change their appearance in accordance with their linguistic intent. What this boils down to is they physically become their meaning, and one octopus observing another is watching the unfolding of internalized neurological states within the organism being reflected in color changes on the surface of the skin. Now these octopii not only can change their color because their soft-bodied creatures. They can also change the texture of their surface from smooth to rugose and folded. They can also, because they're soft-bodied, fold and unfold and reveal and conceal, very rapidly, different parts of their body. So they're capable of a visual dance of communication that is an extremely dense kind of visual signal and in the so-called benthic (sp) octopii, the species that have evolved in very deep water where very little light reaches, they have evolved light-emitting phosphorescent organs, some of them with membranes like eyelids over them, so that even in the darkness of the abyssal depth of the ocean they can carry out this dance of light, self-enfoldment, color change and surface texture which is their linguistic style. In fact the only way an octopus can experience a private thought is to release a cloud of ink into the water into which it can retreat briefly and hide its mental nakedness from its followers. This kind of biologically intrinsic wiring into the potential of language is something that we may be able to mimic and achieve using psychedelic drugs as the inspiration for the direction given to a virtual reality development program. In other words we might be able to create kinds of visibly beheld syntax that would be the human equivalent of the dance of light, texture and positioning that constitutes the grammer and syntax of squids and octopii.
Operationally what these psychedelics do is they dissolve cultural conditioning. Cultural conditioning is like software, but beneath the software is the hardware of brain and organism and by dissolving the cultural conditioning to speak English, German, Swahili or whatever, then one returns to this ur-sprach, this primal language of the animal body and can explore the real dimension of feeling that culture has a tendency to cut us off from. Culture replaces authentic feeling with words. As an example of this, imagine an infant lying in its cradle, and the window is open, and into the room comes something, marvelous, mysterious, glittering, shedding light of many colors, movement, sound, a tranformative hierophany of integrated perception and the child is enthralled and then the mother comes into the room and she says to the child, 'that's a bird, baby, that's a bird,' instantly the complex wave of the angel peacock irridescent transformative mystery is collapsed, into the word. All mystery is gone, the child learns this is a bird, this is a bird, and by the time we're five or six years old all the mystery of reality has been carefully tiled over with words. This is a bird, this is a house, this is the sky, and we seal ourselves in within a linguistic shell of disempowered perception, and what the psychedelics do is they burst apart this cultural envelope of confinement and return us really to the legacy and birthright of the organism.