| 
     
      
        CASE STUDY  
      
        
         
        
         Background 
      In 1991 I wrote a political satire entitled "In the Year 2252" 
        (P. Barber, pseudonym). Copies were circulated prematurely by a Chicago 
        literary agent. As a result, many publishers, editors and writers accessed copies. 
       Before a second draft was prepared it was clear covert censorship would 
        prevent any possibility of publication... I was already under 24 hour 
        a day surveillance and was fielding feedback from corrupt sections of 
        the entertainment industry; especially the media. 
       The reasons for their objections are many. The book was critical of many 
        things which criminals in high places use to get what they want (and control 
        others). Corruption, drugs, war, media deception, and all manner of immorality 
        were openly attacked in the novel. I also lobbied on privacy laws. The personal repercussions are outlined 
        below. (What the media did is highlighted under "Feedback") 
  
While reading this account please keep in mind the wide reaching influence of covert agencies and organised crime throughout our community. A few "well placed" people in each area can create havoc for those being silenced. Others working with these criminals are too selfish, scared or apathetic to intervene. 
        
         
         Who Knows?  
        The following people know who is involved: 
        
       
        - John Howard (Australian Liberal Prime Minister). Three people 
          (incl. a senior Federal Police executive and an ex agency member) informed 
          me that the Prime Minister "is aware of" the situation but 
          that "his hands are tied". Early in 1996 he did, in fact, 
          ask the AFP to investigate the surveillance but they were unable to 
          (efficiently) for "legal reasons". Although I was told 
          it was because the matter was "politically sensitive". 
          
 NB: If the media could "tune in" so could the AFP. They 
            couldn't help because of who is involved. 
            
          - Ros Chilvers (Ex agency / private investigator) - She spoke 
          with Paul Keating when he was Labor Prime Minister and told me he was 
          actually part of the vendetta against me. 
          
 
          -  Warren College (Federal Cabinet Secretary's Office) - He spoke 
          with current PM, John Howard, who said the situation was "too awkward" 
          (for him to intervene). It's "awkward" because Federal Labor politicians, 
          agency officials and the media ARE involved as are their counterparts 
          in the US. It is, in fact, a criminal conspiracy of silence. 
          
 
          - Steve Duffield (Ex Sen. Alston's office) - He knew and tried 
          to help. Within a week he was gone and cannot be found. 
          
 
          -  Ms J. Bonner (Ex J. Howard's office) - Knew but now refuses 
          to discuss it; even with liberal staffers. 
          
 
          -  Matt Francis (Sen. Newman's office) - Said many working in 
          politics knew I was monitored/harassed because of the book, adding it 
          had " opened his eyes" to realise the full extent of what actually goes 
          on (i.e. political crimes). 
          
 
		    -  Mick Roberts (Ex AFP) - On his retirement he told me that he'd always believed me totally but there was a wall of secrecy which he couldn't break through.  No one would talk and it all "smells of journalists and politicians" he said.
          
  
          -  Nelson Chad (Investigator/Ex policeman) - Channel 9 journalists 
          (in particular Ray Martin and others working on "A Current Affair") 
          were involved. This was even confirmed by one ACP director, Mr. G. Cubbin. 
          
 Note: Channel 9 owner, Kerry Packer is not the only media magnate 
            who wants me silenced. No media player would want the general public 
            becoming fully aware of the invasions of privacy and crimes which 
            journalists and agency officials commit. Remember,  I lobbied heavily on privacy 
            laws for years with John Howard himself supporting my views, in writing. 
         
       
       
         Various 
        means of harassment & persecution 
      Blacklisting 
       
      
        For much 
          of the last nine years I have been kept from gainful employment. This 
          is despite the fact I have degrees in Law and Economics and a solid 
          working background that includes time with The Chamber of Commerce, 
          a major bank and the Australian taxation office. "Instructions" were 
          probably circulated by those involved in criminal activities. (One private 
          investigator told me the word was out that everyone was to "wash 
          their hands" of the matter. No-one would dare help.)   
          Many obstacles stand between me and real work although I have been "allowed" 
          simple work: telemarketing. 
       
      Overt 
        Intimidation 
      
        - 
          
 I've 
            been followed and harassed by corrupt P.I.'s and police, however they 
            have not accosted me at any stage.   
         
        - 
          
At crucial 
            moments, crank phone calls come through to my home. Nothing is ever 
            said. Silence... then they hang up. 
         
        - 
          
My mail 
            (esp. from the USA) is often intercepted. IF I get it then it's either 
            opened/annotated or a reply of little consequence. eg: one letter 
            had a drawing of a surveillance satellite monitoring me and the words 
            "Have a nice day". 
         
        -  
          
 Helicopters 
            and small planes deliberately "buzz" my home and follow (or even hover 
            overhead) as I walk/drive. This can happen countless times on any 
            given day or night in clear view of friends/relatives. This can be triggered 
            by an event (eg. Going to the mailbox), a political statement I make 
            in private (sometimes bringing in up to three "choppers" immediately) 
            or a time of day (e.g. when a particular Channel 9 or Channel 7 current 
            affairs program is running).   
         
        - Siren 
          "wailing" can also be triggered in a similar manner to the aircraft 
          harassment. Embarrassingly, these often coincide with trips to the bathroom 
          etc. If I'm on the street, ambulances will wait on corners or stop their 
          sirens as they approach me; often turning around (clearly going nowhere 
          in particular). 
 
      
        NB: False 
        alarms, corrupt dispatchers and bribes to pilots (for flight deviations) 
        all help effect these forms of harassment. My enquiries revealed all 
        of these are common practices.   
		 
      Surveillance 
         
       
        From 1991 
          until this day I have been under 24 hour a day satellite audio/visual 
          surveillance. The results have been made available to politicians and 
          journalists. Private investigators confirmed that ex PM, P. Keating 
          and Channel 9 "A Current Affair" personnel were actively involved, but 
          there were many others. (Notably some Labor politicians worked for Kerry 
          Packer's Channel 9 after retiring eg: Richardson, Hawke).   
        Without 
          their knowledge, my relatives were also frequently monitored in the 
          early '90's. Notably by late 1996 the direct media monitoring 
          of the (agency) signals stopped as more advanced satellite systems were 
          employed. It is suspected this may be due to the fact that the Liberal 
          government (elected March '96) were not actively involved in the harassment 
          so other means of attacking me were found. However I am uncertain of 
          the precise reason.   
       
        
Feedback 
         
      
        - 
          
Countless 
            speeches, news items, advertisements, scripts and "writings" have 
            been peppered with my ideas/words/phrases. These came not only from 
            the surveillance results but also the book which, though covertly 
            "banned" by the criminals concerned, was also extensively "used" by 
            many writers / editors; especially those working for Rupert Murdoch 
            (eg: Harper Collins, the Telegraph etc).   
            Not only did I find some TV executives that admitted such thefts and 
            harassment techniques are used, but one even openly admitted his own 
            people were partially to blame.   
         
        - 
          
Much 
            of the feedback involves subtle but constant death threats.  
           
         
        - 
          
Many 
            media personnel in Sydney were clearly informed of the relevant audio 
            surveillance frequencies and were monitoring directly until late 1996. 
            This was made most obvious by comments made by "live to air" 
            broadcasters (TV / radio). Clearly the presenters were signalled and 
            "fed".   
            
  In my case, the switch (to more advanced monitoring systems) also coincided with the PM's office instructing 
            that I would no longer receive replies to my correspondence; though the significance may be minor. For all 
            I know I may merely have been taking the place of another politically 
            selected experimental target; for an illegal human research programme. 
               
			  
			 
  
 Examples of feedback (by Channel 9) 
      
 
        - PROMOS - eg: Kerry Packer's ACP Director, Mr Graeme Cubbin, admitted 
          that the "I AM CHANNEL 9" promo was in fact aimed AT me. Many 
          of the on air presenters working at 9 featured in that ad; I believe 
          most knew what they were doing.
          - PHRASES - eg: Just before "A Current Affair" ended 
          on Channel 9 for 1992, then presenter Jana Wendt was quoted in a magazine 
          as saying: "I guess I'll go to my grave not being able to think past 
          the end of my nose", a comment I made (knowing it would be overheard) 
          just prior to that interview (not exactly a common saying). And it was 
          not the only reference in the article. Coincidences? Imagine such coincidences 
          happening a dozen times a day - for years - and you'll appreciate why 
          this "parroting" is so useful to them. It's extremely oppressive.
          - DIRECT FEEDBACK - eg: On at least two memorable occasions I responded 
          to "live" taunts by Channel 9 employees only to have the entire transmission 
          cut completely and immediately.
          - OTHER "COINCIDENCES" - eg: ACA, Ch.9 presenter, Ray Martin, 
          ran an item on politicians who don't answer correspondence. They suggested 
          viewers use a company called Voterlobby. 
          
The link is that I'd just contacted the Prime Minister's chief of staff about my many (and various) unanswered letters to Mr Howard and his Cabinet AND had used Voterlobby to question MPs on the need for enforceable privacy laws. (Prior to being elected in March 1996 Mr Howard had been supportive of my views) 
   
 
         Meetings (Jan 97) 
        
      
 
	   
Eg. 1 Mike Minehan (Ex Ch.9, ACA, UTS)
 
A security guard tried to prevent our appointment taking place; under instructions from an
"unknown" outside caller.  Similarly, Minehan was interrupted constantly by phone calls.  On 
the last call he slammed the phone down exclaiming:  "They're telling me to get out. Now!"
However he had already told me that my situation was "not uncommon".
He suggested I see Jana Wendt.  He seemed genuinely worried.
  
Eg. 2 Jana Wendt (Ex Ch.9, ACA, Ch.7 etc)
 
She was dismissed from Ch.7 just before our appointment so I visited her family home instead.
She said her secretary would make another appointment but warned me that TV execs control things. (Stephen Rice was her boss at Ch.9 then Ch.7).
 
Eastwood police later harrassed me, at the request of their "friends" at Ch.7.  They refused to
speak to Wendt personally.  I was told not to make any appointment and was taken to a
psychiatric hospital as a "warning".  Before I was assessed and released (by a bemused 
psychiatrist who saw no reason for my being there at all) "knowledgeable" staff told me that at
least six others who sought assistance from Wendt had also been sent there.  "This is what you
get for crossing them "said one senior nurse. (They knew yet co-operated).
Since this worrying episode I have learnt much about the role of mainstream media identities
from agency officials, on-air targets etc.  Little wonder suppression and oppression are rife in this country (and many other western "democracies"). The media mafia has far too much power.
  
Eg. 3 Kerry Packer (media magnate, ACP etc)
 
While I waited at reception Mr Packer and his son exited the car park and took the lift; James 
Packer looking back at me before disappearing into the elevator.  Six goons then surrounded me, 
the leader claiming I'd been up to Packer's 3rd floor office six times.  (I wasn't even sure 
Packer would be there. Also, this was my only visit and I was on the ground floor).
When I scoffed, asking for proof of this lie, he said "Oh just get out anyway". I did. 
I wasn't going to give them an excuse to set something up.
N.B. Because of these experiences no further attempts have been made to resolve this situation
face to face.  Employees of media magnates, Singleton, Packer and Murdoch are all involved in my situation.  Some, I'm told, are also involved heavily in the drug trade (hence the mafia / C.I.A links, and the technology access).  It's also worth noting that in 1990-91, when this all started, all three media bosses were staunchly behind the Australian Labor Party; the central source of the problem.
  
  
 
         Comment 
        
      
 
	   
My own situation is known to many and some of the more bizarre/significant "coincidences" have been deliberately omitted. However, the brief illustration has hopefully served its purpose.
Like the covert agencies themselves (especially the CIA), those using surveillance results to torment innocent people are little more than modern day (electronic) Nazis. Many are prominent public figures with no fear of the law and little or no respect for others. Controlling public perception / opinion through such people is a priority for both the agencies and those whose interests they protect. Obviously only those who are "co-operative" gain prominent positions within the relevant media circles. In fact some sections of the media are responsible for gross human rights abuses including (ironically) the suppression of free speech. 
Once again, freedom of the press should not grant a freedom to oppress.
        NB: If a target is relatively unaffected by the media feedback 
        or "tunes out" to all media / entertainment output (to avoid the feedback 
        / harassment) then other, more advanced forms of harassment (like the 
        neurophone and brain wave analysers) can take their place. This switch 
        may also occur if the agency / criminals responsible wish to prevent direct 
        monitoring of their frequencies by the media, Federal Police etc (for 
        whatever reason).
  
 
 
        
         
      Religious 
        Persecution  
       
        Although 
          I am of the Catholic faith, and was subtly ridiculed for that, the Catholic 
          Church (which is closely aligned with the Australian Labor Party, which 
          fostered the situation) has also harassed me using the results of the 
          surveillance.   
        While 
          some priests were sympathetic (one even admitting he'd heard about the 
          "banned" book), others did as the church hierarchy instructed. The links 
          between the church, the Labor party and overseas crime figures are well 
          known. There may have been some "pressure" applied.
  Note: 
It is interesting that one of the guilty priests, an ex bikie named Kevin Lee, was chosen as a contestant on the Pentridge Jail Challenge run by A. Denton, Radio 2mmm, Nov 2001.  Apparently he won.  Odd coincidences like this were common in the early 90s. (I wonder who else he harrassed).
  
      
      Neurophone/Aural 
        Harassment  
       
        Since 
          September 1996, I've been receiving constant/clear threats and propaganda 
          from an unknown agency/criminal source; probably the CIA.   
        This method 
          of "torture" (which seems to be known to many political/media entities) 
          is usually delivered courtesy of a satellite which tracks you, personally. 
          A laser directs live talk, noise and computer-generated music at the 
          body. It travels the nervous system as electrical impulses and registers 
          in the brain; bypassing normal hearing mechanisms. Only the target hears 
          it.   
        Prominent 
          journalists and senior federal police say it's "not uncommon" and I 
          know there are thousands of political victims in the USA and hundreds 
          here.   
        The motives 
          for this form of oppression seem to go beyond providing an "annoyance". 
          The hope "seems" to be that the victim will be discredited if they react 
          badly to the verbal taunts OR approach the wrong people for assistance. 
          For example, media "mafia" personnel, politically naïve medicos or ignorant 
          police could make matters worse. In the US, where the authorities refuse 
          to concede their own government encourages such activities, the complainants 
          are often committed.  
        Meanwhile, 
          senior federal police, some political aides
          and human rights activists are the most supportive here. Many are honest 
          enough to admit they know which technologies big brother agencies and 
          criminals can access. However practical help cannot be offered.  
         
       
      Experimentation 
        - Brain wave Monitoring  
       
        Also since 
          September 1996, I've been humiliated as a target of an experimental 
          technology (again, satellite based) which allows the magnetic field 
          around your head to be monitored. This powerful scanning and tracking 
          system delivers the results to an unknown (probably US) facility with 
          an advanced computer system capable of interpreting the brain wave patterns 
          it receives; instantaneously.   
        The aural 
          feedback then makes for a means of remote interrogation and/or psychological 
          torture. Combined with audio/visual surveillance the overall situation 
          is like being in an electronic POW camp. One senior AFP executive said 
          this may continue for many years and they are powerless to stop it.
   
          The human rights abuses I'm experiencing are considerable. However, 
          what concerns me most is that ostensibly democratic governments can 
          allow the development and "use" of such evil technologies to stifle 
          free speech.    
Conclusion  
 Many public figures betray us by their silence on these matters. Many politicians/journalists are actively oppressing others themselves; by stealth. And you won't read about it because the media are themselves part of the problem.
 
        Finally, 
          it may be worth noting the comments of a senior investigator from NASA's 
          Inspector General's office. Having conceded the existence of the technologies 
          mentioned in these pages AND commenting on the evil uses made of such 
          anti-personnel weaponry he advised: "I suggest you pray".  
         
      
      Please contact 
        the UN, the International Red Cross or Amnesty International to express your concerns.   
         
     | 
 |